Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:59
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do you trump Trump’s executive order to bring back plastic straws?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
China Housing Demand to Stay at 75% Below Peak, Goldman Says - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Can you share a story of someone who had a lucky experience while hitchhiking?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Early-season heat dome brings highest temperatures in years to parts of Eastern U.S. - NPR
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
As measles spreads across the Americas, outbreaks in Mexico and Canada have also turned deadly - CNN
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.